Bottleneck Calculator Logo
Advertisement
Best CPU For

Best CPU for the GTX 1660 Super

The processors that pair with an GTX 1660 Super without a bottleneck, ranked, with the best-value and best-overall picks, and where to buy.

1080p graphics cardGPU score 71.4~68 FPS 1080p~46 FPS 1440p

Quick answer

Best value
Ryzen 5 3600
Cheapest chip that won't bottleneck the GTX 1660 Super
Best overall
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Highest frame rates & best 1% lows

Complete your build

Everything else a GTX 1660 Super build needs, matched to the card.

The GTX 1660 Super was the value darling of its generation: a proper 1080p card that skipped the ray tracing hardware to hit a friendlier price. Years on, it's still a capable 1080p performer for a huge library of games, and a very common card in used and hand-me-down builds.

On the CPU side, the 1660 Super is undemanding. It sits a rung above the true entry cards but is still comfortably fed by any modern mid-range processor, so the question isn't how much CPU to buy, but how little you can get away with before you're wasting money. A sensible six-core leaves the card as the limiting part in almost everything, which is exactly where you want it.

The ranking below goes from the cheapest chip that won't hold the 1660 Super back to progressively faster ones. For this card, you rarely need to climb far.

Does the CPU matter for the GTX 1660 Super at 1080p, 1440p and 4K?

The GTX 1660 Super is a 1080p card first and foremost, and at that resolution the graphics chip does the heavy lifting while the processor coasts. A faster CPU only pulls ahead in CPU-bound esports games chasing high frame rates.

At 1080p the CPU matters most. Frame rates are high and the GTX 1660 Super finishes each frame quickly, so a slow processor is what holds you back in CPU-heavy games. This is the resolution where picking the right CPU makes the biggest difference.

At 1440p the balance evens out. The GTX 1660 Super works harder per frame, so the gap between a mid-range and a high-end CPU shrinks. A solid modern 6-core is plenty for most players here.

At 4K the CPU barely matters. The GTX 1660 Super is the limit (around 46 FPS in AAA games), so almost any chip on this list keeps up. If you only play at 4K, buy the cheapest CPU that clears the "no bottleneck" bar and spend the savings elsewhere.

Best CPU for the GTX 1660 Super on AM4, AM5 and Intel

The 1660 Super doesn't reward an expensive platform, so on both AMD and Intel the aim is a well-priced mid-range chip with no compromises. Here's the pick on each.

AM4 (older AMD boards): the Ryzen 7 5700X3D is the standout gaming chip, with the 5800X3D a step up. Both let you pair the GTX 1660 Super without changing motherboard, the easiest upgrade path for an existing AM4 build.

AM5 (current AMD): the Ryzen 5 7600 is the value pick; the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the best gaming chip and the one to get for the highest frame rates and future GPU upgrades.

Intel: the Core i5-13400F or 12400F is the value option; the Core i7-14700K adds headroom for streaming and heavy multitasking.

For the very fastest cards, lean toward AM5 or a high-end Intel chip; on mainstream cards the value picks above are all you need.

Best CPUs for the GTX 1660 Super, ranked

1

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Best overall
More than enough~240 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
2

Ryzen 7 9800X3D

More than enough~236 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
3

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

More than enough~226 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
4

Core i9-14900K

More than enough~209 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
5

Ryzen 5 9600X

More than enough~206 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
6

Core i7-14700K

More than enough~201 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
7

Ryzen 7 7700X

More than enough~196 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
8

Core i5-14600K

More than enough~190 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
9

Ryzen 5 7600X

More than enough~184 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
10

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

More than enough~182 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
11

Ryzen 5 7600

More than enough~176 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
12

Core i5-13400F

More than enough~150 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
13

Core i5-12400F

More than enough~135 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
14

Ryzen 7 5700X

More than enough~132 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
15

Ryzen 5 5600X

More than enough~125 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
16

Ryzen 5 5600

More than enough~122 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
17

Ryzen 5 5500

More than enough~120 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)
18

Ryzen 5 3600

Best value pick
More than enough~112 FPS ceiling (CPU-heavy games)

Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you buy through them we may earn a small commission, at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. It never changes what we recommend.

How to read the pairing labels

No bottleneck, ideal: the sweet spot. This CPU keeps the GTX 1660 Super fed at 1080p without you paying for more chip than you need.

More than enough: comfortably ahead of what the GTX 1660 Super needs, great for high-refresh play, streaming and future GPU upgrades.

Slight limit at 1080p: a little short in the busiest games at 1080p, but fine at 1440p and 4K.

Holds it back at 1080p: caps the GTX 1660 Super in CPU-heavy games at 1080p. Still perfectly usable at 4K, where the GPU is the limit anyway.

The "FPS ceiling" is roughly how many frames each CPU can push in demanding, CPU-heavy games before it becomes the limit, it's why a stronger chip helps most at high refresh and with 1% lows. Average FPS in GPU-bound games is set by the GTX 1660 Super itself.

Check your exact combo

Want the precise bottleneck and frame rate for the GTX 1660 Super with a specific CPU and game? Run it through the calculators.

Best CPU for the GTX 1660 Super: your questions answered

A modern mid-range six-core like a Ryzen 5 5600 or Core i5-12400F is ideal: quick enough that the 1660 Super is always the bottleneck, cheap enough that you're not throwing money at cores the card can't use. Anything faster is fine but buys you no extra frames in games at this level.

A Ryzen 5 5500 on AM4 or a Core i3-12100F on Intel keeps costs down while still fully feeding the card. Both are inexpensive and run cool, and neither leaves the 1660 Super waiting. That's the perfect kind of match for a budget-focused 1080p build.

A Core i5-12400F is the standout: cheap, efficient, and far more than the 1660 Super requires. A Core i3-12100F saves a little more with almost no gaming penalty here. Both use the LGA 1700 platform and leave nothing on the table for this class of card.

On AM4, a Ryzen 5 5600 is the sweet spot and a Ryzen 5 5500 trims cost further. A Ryzen 5 5600G is worth a look if you want integrated graphics as a backup. There's no gaming case for jumping to AM5 with a card in this bracket.

No, they're a good budget match. The 5500 comfortably outpaces what the 1660 Super needs at 1080p, so the card sets the frame rate in nearly every game. You're getting everything the 1660 Super can give without overspending on the processor.

Yes. Older quad-core i7 chips and their i5 siblings still feed a 1660 Super perfectly well at 1080p, which is why so many of these cards live in reused older systems. You may leave a few frames on the table in the most CPU-heavy games, but for most titles it's a fine pairing.

Yes. Unlike the smaller GTX 1650, the 1660 Super draws around 125W and requires a single 8-pin PCIe power cable. Any modern power supply provides one, but a very old or very small unit in a prebuilt might not, so it's worth checking before you buy.

No. It's a Turing card without the Tensor cores DLSS needs, so Nvidia's AI upscaling isn't available. If you need to recover frames in a demanding game, you're limited to lowering settings or older in-game scaling rather than DLSS.

No. The 1660 Super deliberately left out the dedicated ray tracing cores that define Nvidia's RTX line, so ray-traced effects aren't a practical option. It's a pure rasterization card, so plan your settings with that in mind.

For 1080p, generally yes. The 1660 Super's 6GB handles most games at medium-to-high settings without trouble, though a few of the newest, most texture-heavy titles will push against it and ask you to dial textures back. It's a comfortable amount for the card's 1080p job.

As a 1080p card for esports, indie games and most AAA titles at medium-to-high settings, it still delivers. It's outclassed by newer RTX cards and can't touch ray tracing or DLSS, but for mainstream 1080p gaming on a budget it remains a solid, dependable performer.

Around a 450W supply is the guideline. With roughly 125W of draw over a single 8-pin connector, the 1660 Super is easy to power, and any decent modern 450W-or-larger unit runs it with room to spare for a mid-range CPU.

Advertisement